by Harold
Pinter
MTC at Fairfax Studio, Feb 28 until 12 April, 2001
Reviewer: Kate
Herbert
There is a creeping
fear in us all of betrayal by a lover, a partner, a friend. In Harold Pinter's
1978 play, Betrayal, a wife's affair with her husband's best friend for seven
years is not the only treachery.
Emma, played with great composure by Sigrid Thornton, sets
up a little secret love nest with Jerry (Richard Piper) unknown, or so we
think, to her husband, Robert (Martin Jacobs).
The beauty of Pinter's structuring of this deceptively
simple play, is that we know everything from the first scene. He runs the play
backwards chronologically and we see the last meeting of Emma and Jerry at the
point of Emma and Robert's separation.
We all know the destructive power of deception and
infidelity. We recognise, even predict, the ruin in others. We are blind to our
own spiral into self-destruction through love.
This is a strong production of an exceptional play directed
unobtrusively and intelligently by Kate Cherry, designed stylishly by Anna
Borghesi with music by Ian McDonald.
My only quibble is that it lacks some of the necessary
passion and sensuality seen in other productions or in the English film
starring Jeremy Irons.
Thornton is well known and highly regarded for her screen
work but this is her first stage appearance and she demonstrates that she
possesses the vocal and emotional range for this part.
Piper is suitably chipper and anxious as Jerry while Jacobs
gives a delightfully muscular performance as the abrasive and brusque Robert.
Pinter, by running the story in reverse, allows us to view
not the breakdown of the relationships but where they have come from and how
they have bren.
He explores the fickleness of not only love but of memory.
Even the characters' most precious memories are questioned. This play was based
on Pinter's own experience of a triangle of love with Joan Bakewell.
Betrayal was a departure from Pinter's obscure, ambiguous
and oblique earlier plays such as The Birthday Party, The Homecoming and The
Caretaker. However, he retains the crispness of the dialogue, and the subtle
representation of misunderstandings and unspent thoughts of the early works.
By Kate Herbert
No comments:
Post a Comment